首页AI 工具Continue
Continue logo
Continue
An open-source AI code assistant you can customize and connect to any model, inside VS Code or JetBrains.
0
收藏数
Free (open source, bring your own API key)
起步价
Continue
开发者
Continue
产品截图

Continue 是什么?

内容最后核实于 May 4, 2026 · 由 AI Tools Set 研究团队撰写

Continue is an open-source AI coding assistant that runs as an extension inside VS Code or JetBrains IDEs, built around the idea that developers should be able to fully customize which model powers their assistant rather than being locked to one vendor's default. You configure it to use models from Anthropic, OpenAI, local Ollama models, or others, and can build custom slash commands and context providers tailored to your own workflow.

It's aimed at developers and teams who want IDE-integrated AI assistance — inline autocomplete, chat, and edit commands — without the vendor lock-in of a closed-source tool tied to a single model and pricing structure. Because it's open source, teams can also self-host and audit exactly what's happening with their code.

Continue itself is free and open source. As with other bring-your-own-key tools, your cost is whatever you spend on API usage with your chosen model provider.

Continue 的核心功能

  • Model flexibility: Connect any supported model provider or local model rather than being locked to one.
  • IDE-native integration: Runs as an extension inside VS Code and JetBrains IDEs.
  • Custom slash commands: Build your own custom commands and context providers for your workflow.
  • Open source: Fully open source, auditable, and self-hostable.

Continue 的使用场景

  • Get AI code assistance inside VS Code or a JetBrains IDE without vendor lock-in
  • Connect a self-hosted or local model to an IDE-integrated assistant
  • Build custom commands tailored to a team's specific workflow
  • Audit exactly how an AI coding assistant handles your code, since it's open source

优缺点

优点
Free and open source with full model flexibility
Self-hostable for teams with data-privacy requirements
Custom commands and context providers make it adaptable to specific workflows
缺点
Requires more setup and configuration than a plug-and-play commercial tool
You manage your own model provider billing separately
Fewer polished, autonomous-agent features than some commercial competitors
在您的网站上推广 Continue
分享
用户评价
Sign in to review
4.8
★★★★★
2,341 reviews
5
1,826
4
328
3
117
2
47
1
23